Project Summary: here are the question, 100 words per question, a total of 300 words around, is the quality of the work not the quantity of the work, that's what our prof said. it's due on May 22, 23:30 CST 1. Can you think of any way for Locke to defend his claim that substances exist, but we do not know what they are? How would Locke respond to Berkeley’s conclusion that we can know only ideas? 2. Descartes reestablished his system of beliefs because of his famous statement “I am a thing that thinks.” Where is the place of the thing that thinks in Locke’s system? Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning and how it applies to the systems of Descartes and Locke. 3. Explain why Berkeley thinks his arguments are a response to the skepticism threatened by Locke’s epistemology. Then argue that Berkeley’s position creates a further skeptical problem. How might Berkeley respond?