Project Summary: this is an English essay about 4-5 pages proving the following topic : Discuss the extent to which one might consider Gloucester a secondary tragic hero through his participation in Aristotelian conventions. Why is he only a lesser tragic hero, not a main one (i.e., what conventions does he not participate in fully)? Why did Shakespeare create two parallel tragic heroes? How does it make the play better than if he had only one plotline and one tragic hero? TUTOR REQUIRMENTS - knows about Shakespeare tragic hero's - knows about the Aristotelian conventions of a tragic hero ( there is a file in here) - knows about the literacy play: king Lear - Able to make a strong thesis that a high schooler can come up with (make it strong but not university professor complex ) - must send me a copy of each paragraph when completed ( intro(gos,thesis) body paragraph 1, 2, closing statment) -must no plagiarism and work cite last page