In approximately 300 words, please: Summarize and briefly explain Rachels’ argument for active voluntary euthanasia. How does the distinction between “killing versus letting die” play a role in Rachels’ particular argument? What thought experiment(s) does Rachels make use of in order to substantiate his particular position on the matter? Are there any worries/difficulties that Rachels’ argument seem to face? If so, what are they and how might Rachels respond to those worries/difficulties?