For this assignment, first review the background (listed below) materials with a focus on Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership model. Make sure you are familiar with the four leadership styles covered in the situational approach including Directing, Coaching, Supporting, and Delegating and situations where you are supposed to use these four styles. Also, familiarize yourself with the more complex Path-Goal model and Fiedler’s Contingency model. You don’t need to know these two models in as much detail as the Situational model to complete this assignment, but make sure you understand the main idea of these models as well as some of their main advantages and disadvantages.

Date Posted: 12/08/2020

Category: General
Due Date: 16/08/2020

Instruction

1. For each of the following situations, explain which of the four leadership styles covered in the Situational model should be used and explain your reasoning with references to Chapter 4 of Avery (2011) and at least one other required reading from the background materials: A. You are in charge of a team of architects. They are highly skilled but have strong opinions and do not necessarily follow instructions. These architects are independent thinkers who are used to doing things their own way. B. You are in charge of a fast-food restaurant. The employees are all teenagers who have not yet graduated from high school, and this is the first job for most of them. C. You are the supervisor of a team of software engineers. They are all highly skilled and highly motivated, and are used to working independently. All of them believe in the mission of the company. 2. Each of the three models (Situational, Fielder Contingency, Path-Goal) covered in this module involves both “inputs” and “outputs.” For example, Situational Leadership involves taking employee commitment and competency as inputs and then—based on the employee information—choosing Directing, Coaching, Supporting, or Delegating as an output. Create a table comparing and contrasting the three models in terms of inputs and outputs, and include a 1- or 2-paragraph discussion of your table. 3. Based on your table in Part 2 above and the readings, which of the three models do you think is most useful? Take into consideration both its ability to adapt leadership styles to realistic situations you may face, as well as ease of use of the model. REFERENCE MATERIEAL: Evans, M. G. (2002). Chapter 4: Path-Goal theory of leadership. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership VIDEO: Avery, G. (2011). Contingency theories: Situations matter. In Chapter 4 of Understanding leadership: Paradigms and cases. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2012). Chapter 12.4: What is the role of the context? Contingency approaches to leadership. In Organizational behavior. Saylor Academy. VIDEO: Ibarra, H. (2015). Situational leadership VIDEO: Evans, M. G. (2002). Chapter 4: Path-Goal theory of leadership. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership. VIDEO:

Attached

Download File 1 ()

Download File 2 (pdf)

Download File 3 (pdf)

Tutor Uploads

Download File 1 (docx)

Download File 2 (pdf)

Bidders

proffesoranncarrl 6 years, 1 month ago
Rated 9.76 earned 242948.42 around 9258 assignments.

Hello boss

$25.00

Reference material uploaded
User_17085 | Aug 12, 2020, 21:49 PM
File 1 not opening
proffesoranncarrl | Aug 12, 2020, 21:50 PM
Please disregard file one, File 2 and 3 and the valid ones.
User_17085 | Aug 12, 2020, 22:28 PM
I also posted another assignment
User_17085 | Aug 12, 2020, 22:28 PM
assignment complete boss. plagiarism report also attached
proffesoranncarrl | Aug 14, 2020, 17:30 PM