Instruction
Check BLACKBOARD ANNOUNCEMENT Due date
Research Papers automatically scored as zero points include but are not limited to the following:
1) Turn it in Similarity report of a minimum 35%
2) Little independent scholarship.
3) The paper is primarily transitional paragraphs that recounts other authors or other articles.
4) No evidence of student's analysis or critical thinking.
Research Paper Scenario:
The Texas Senate and Governor has hired you as an economic and policy advisor. Your clients would like to know if they should raise minimum wages, inclusive of the minimum wages of wait staff. What are your policy recommendations?
This is a well measured, considered analytical researched thesis presentation reinforced by scholarship and research
As a consultant you must establish what the Governor is trying to do. You may introduce new ideas to help the Governor accomplish his or her Goals. Introduce statistics and data from data from the articles, BLS.Gov, federal reserves.gov or other PEER REVIEWED SOURCES
Required Sources:
Students Must independently source a minimum of 3 Peer reviewed articles
Optional Sources:
Students may use the sources on this document in addition to their independent peer reviewed sources.
The paper must be accompanied by an annotated bibliography.
Have a well-defined Abstract/thesis paragraph(s)
Things to consider as you prepare your proposal for the Governor:
1. Different perspectives on this argument from, business owners, households, government etc
2. Analyze the evidence that each author uses to support his/her thesis: What types of evidence are used? Does the evidence support his or her thesis?
3. Evaluate the qualification of the authors: What bias might the authors have?
4. Use statistics and facts and macroeconomic theories to evaluate the articles.
5. The older articles generated published critiques in peer reviewed articles. This means students should perform a literature review of “peer reviewed” articles to form their “measured, qualified conclusion. RESEARCH NOT RANTS”
Although the Question is the same for Macroeconomics and Microeconomics, the concepts used to evaluate the thesis are different. Submitting the “Same paper or similar paper for RCON 2301 and Econ 2302 is plagiarism. AT least one paper will Earn zero points
Professorial Hints:
What is the strategic goal of the policy?
Are there better tactical goals to reach the strategic Goals?
What, in your research, supports or disavows the presented articles?
What are the best tactical polices to attain the strategic Goals?
What is the empirical evidence? What is the data?
ECONOMICS is always asking “Why!”
Students must “Make A Decision.” And defend their decisions within the parameters of Economics theory and peer reviewed articles that supports or disavows the given articles.
In Economics, Opinion is defined is the “well informed analysis of the thesis.” Rants are not Research
MACRO STUDENTS
The macro argument should involve theories learned from
CPI, GDP Economic Growth, Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply, Multiplier effect, Public Policy Fiscal and Monetary policy etc
MICRO STUDENTS
The micro argument should involve theories learned from:
Theory of the Firm, Costs of Production, Resources Costs, MRP, MC,
This research paper is a “semester project” it is not a night before its due project.
RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT: Chicago Style is used for Paper Format and Citations:
Header Requirements
Assignment Date Formatted
Class Name section: example ECON 2302-105
Paper Title
Page number of number of pages: example page 5 of 8
Length: Minimum of 5 pages
Not including:
Title Pages,
Work Cited, including footnotes,
Graphics such as data tables, Graphs, Images etc.
Submission requirements: The paper must be submitted in two areas before it is considered for grading.
Administrative Submission
“Turn It In,” Submission
Emailed Papers will neither be Accepted or Acknowledged. Submission in one portal but not another will result in Zero. Must be submitted on time, No reopens.
This Research Paper should not be plagiarized. Plagiarized Papers are not viewed or graded. This is a TERM RESEARCH PAPER
This is not an op-ed but a term research paper. Normative Statements will not be accepted. Non-vetted sites or non-scholarly sites or journals are not sources and will not be accepted. Students should use the articles presented and their textbook.
The articles are background information. Students must use the articles and must use theories learned in class to explain the articles' positions.
REFERENCE ARTICLES:
What's Best AT Reducing Poverty? An Examination of the Effectiveness of the 2007 Minimum Wage Increase. http://www.epionline.org/study/r124/
Can Raising the Minimum Wage Reduce Poverty and Hardship? https://www.epionline.org/studies/can-raising-the-minimum-wage-reduce-poverty-and-hardship/
The Impact of a $9.80 Federal Minimum Wage. https://www.epionline.org/studies/the-impact-of-a-9-80-federal-minimum-wage/
Is There Consensus in Favor of Wage Mandates? https://www.epionline.org/studies/r142/
2 Parties Place Political Focus on Inequality, by Jeremy W. Peters, The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/us/politics/republicans-move-to-reclaim-poverty-fighting-mantle.html?hpw&rref=politics&_r=0
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/12/04/5-facts-about-the-minimum-wage/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/08/who-makes-minimum-wage/
From the Center for America Progress:
Http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/report/2013/12/10/80780/real-family-values-raising-the-federal-minimum-wage/
Http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/labor/news/2013/12/03/80222/raising-the-minimum-wagel-would-help-not-hurt-our-economy/