Instruction
must answer this question: When Joe Lozito tried to sue the NYPD for failing to come to his aid, the court ruled against him stating that because "no direct promises of protection were made to Mr. Lozito, nor were there direct actions taken to protect Mr. Lozito prior to the attack, the Police had no special duty to come to his aid." Thus, it was not the direct duty of the police to protect him.
In your opinion, is this ruling morally problematic? Why or why not? Should the police have a special direct duty to protect people? Explain.
Must be 1-2 pages length