Instruction
Create a research proposal on the topic you selected last module and submit it to the M2: Assignment 3 Dropbox as a Word attachment. Your research proposal will outline a plan for your final argumentative research essay, and should reflect the work done previously on developing your topic and thesis statement. Your research proposal will be two to three pages long, and you must use the following format:
NAME:
THESIS:
BACKGROUND:
OBJECTIVE:
SUPPORTING POINTS:
1.
a
b
c
2.
a
b
c
3.
a
b
c
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
RESPONSE TO COUNTER-ARGUMENTS:
1.
2.
3.
IMPLICATIONS:
TENTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Prior to posting your research proposal to the Dropbox, review your work and ensure that youve met all of the major points outlined in this modules lecture, The Research Proposal Format. Also, utilize the Example Research Proposal and the grading rubric below to check your own work prior to submitting.
By Wednesday, July 1, 2015, post your research proposal as a Word attachment to the M2: Assignment 3 Dropbox. Use the file naming format: LastName_First Intitial_ENG101_M2_A3Research Proposal.
Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Thesis (making your claim clear)
You state your thesis (your main point) in a single, declarative sentence that can be true or false. Your thesis is neither too narrow nor too broad.
16
Background (what you expect to cover in your argument) You offer a short overview of the main points that you expect to cover in your paper.
4
Objective (your intent in researching and writing on this issue)
4
Supporting Points (explaining the points covered above)
You expand on your overview, with a statement of what you already know about the subject that supports your claim and areas where you will need to do research to fill in your knowledge.
16
Counter-Arguments (what does the other side think?)
You fairly and completely offer the strongest arguments against your position.
12
Response to Counter-Arguments (how do you plan to answer those objections listed above?)
You offer your possible responses to the objections listed above. You avoid fallacious argumentation and note the areas where the other side is correct.
8
Implications (what is the significance of this topic outside of your paper?)
Clearly explain how and why this issue is relevant.
4
Tentative Bibliography (eight potential sources for your paper)
Include a minimum of eight credible and current sources. At least four of these sources should be peer-reviewed. Use the University Library for your research, and present your sources in APA references list format.
16
Format (have you followed the required format and presented this information in a way that your reader can easily interpret?)
(YOUR NAME, THESIS, BACKGROUND, SUPPORTING POINTS, COUNTER-ARGUMENTS, RESPONSE TO COUNTER-ARGUMENTS, IMPLICATIONS, and TENTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY) in capital letters and in the order listed here. Be sure to use APA format for your bibliography.
8
Vocabulary, grammar, and punctuation (the way you present the items listed above)
You use appropriate language, avoiding wordiness, while giving the reader all necessary information. You have no spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors.
12
Total:
100
SEE ATTACHMENT FOR THE ESSAY I HAVE SUBMITTED FOR THIS EARLIER ASSIGNMENT.
User_7304 added on 06/30/15 at 08:26 PM (PST):
Hi expert4u I looked at the work and I didn't see all the things I requested for this assignment. The supporting point needs to have a supporting points labeled 1 with an A,B,C (EXAMPLES)-- 2. A,B,C (EXAMPLES) AND 3. WITH A,B,C (EXAMPLES)
The counter argument is to have a response to counter argument 1, 2, and 3.EXAMPLES..... I WILL CHECK BACK LATER TODAY TO SEE IF THIS HAS BEEN ADDED BEFOR I RELEASE THE PAYMENT. THANKS MANDY
User_7304 added on 06/30/15 at 08:43 PM (PST):
sorry also I asked there to be Included a minimum of eight credible and current sources. on the reference page you submitted 4.
User_7304 added on 07/01/15 at 12:07 AM (PST):
THIS IS COPY OF WHAT THE ASSIGNMENT SHOULD LOOK LIKE SO I AM EXTENDINT THE DUE DATE TO TOMORROW WEDNESDAY JULY 1ST BY 5:00PM PLEASE MAKE THIS RIGHT AND MAKE ME A SATISIFED CUSTOMER AND I CAN ASSIGN YOU THE REST OF MY FUTURE ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE YOUR PAY. .... I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE.
Example Research Proposal
NAME: Jordan Smith
THESIS: Surrogate parenting should not be banned by law.
BACKGROUND: Surrogate parenting is a controversial practice in which a woman becomes pregnant and carries a child to term for another person or couple. In doing so, the woman makes the miracle of parenthood possible for people who are biologically or ethically unable to give birth. At the same time, the surrogate can earn a much-needed fee for providing her services. For these reasons, legal restrictions should not be part of this very personal and private transaction.
OBJECTIVE: This topic will be developed through the use of scholarly journal articles and legal cases from recent years. Though it seems that there has been limited research done on this subject, it will be important to evaluate and analyze as many sources as possible to get a full view of the issue. It will be helpful to look at models for surrogacy and laws or restrictions that are in place in other countries to try to develop an ethical surrogacy system in the U.S.
SUPPORTING POINTS:
Surrogacy benefits parents, because not every potential parent can have a child.
1.Some potentially wonderful parents cannot have children because they are infertile.
2.Some potentially wonderful parents cannot have children because they carry genetic diseases that should not be passed on.
3.Some potentially wonderful parents cannot have children because they are in same-sex relationships.
Surrogacy benefits surrogate mothers because it can be a way of earning much-needed income.
1.A surrogate mother can earn money for school without interrupting her studies.
2.A surrogate mother can earn money while being a stay-at-home mom.
3.A surrogate mother can earn money for a socially worthwhile purposehelping others.
Surrogacy has no detrimental effects on society or governmental concerns. The government has specific legal duties, and these do not involve restricting private arrangements.
1.The right to privacy is implied in the law.
2.The decision to bear a child is a private and very personal decision.
3.The practice has been around for hundreds of years, and banning will drive it undercover but not eliminate it.
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS:
1.Surrogate practices are equivalent to baby selling, which is a crime.
2.A womans health can be endangered by pregnancy.
3.The legal complications that can arise are unavoidable.
RESPONSE TO COUNTER-ARGUMENTS:
1.Surrogate pregnancy is not selling a baby any more than adoption is buying a baby.
2.True, a womans health can be endangered by pregnancy, but surrogacy presents no more dangers than any other type of pregnancy.
3.True, legal complications can occur, including change of mind, decisions when a less-than-perfect childbirth occurs, questions of payments, and genetic traits, but these are no greater than in any other business transaction, yet we do not ban other business transactions.
IMPLICATIONS: As many people wait until they are nearing the end of their reproductive life to have children, it will be increasingly important for our society to understand the full benefits and implications of alternative means of assisted reproduction, such as surrogacy.
TENTATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Constantinidis, D., & Cook, R. (2012). Australian perspectives on surrogacy: The
influence of cognitions, psychological and demographic characteristics. Human
Reproduction, 27, 10801087.
Gabry, L. (2012). Procreating without pregnancy: Surrogacy and the need for a
comprehensive regulatory scheme. Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems,
45, 414450.
Glombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casy, P., & Marks, A. (2011). Families created
through surrogacy: Mother-child relationships and childrens psychological
adjustment at age 7. Developmental Psychology, 47, 15791588.
Hinson, D., & McBrien, M. (2011). Surrogacy across America. Family Advocate, 34(2),
32.
Jaiswal, S. (2012). Commercial surrogacy in India: An ethical assessment of existing
legal scenario from the perspective of womens autonomy and reproductive rights.
Gender Technology and Development, 16, 128.
Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and
public discourse about transnational surrogacy. Social Science & Medicine, 74,
1745.
Rosenberg, M. (2011). Critical legal considerations for all parties to surrogacy
arrangements. Family Advocate, 34(2), 2327.
Vaughn, R. (2011). Advising non-traditional families in multi-jurisdictional surrogacy
arrangements. American Journal of Family Law, 25(3), 105113.