I need 1 paragraph with 7 sentences for each question. There are 10 questions. Each question needs to have a works cited.

1. Give three examples from Harriet A. Washington's "Non-Consenting Adults" where marginalized groups did not give informed consent. 2. Answer the following questions from Harriet A. Washington's "Non-Consenting Adults": Was the PolyHeme Study legal? How could patients opt out of the PolyHeme study? What was the outcome of the study? 3. What document was created as a result of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and briefly summarize its main protections. 4. Why was the Tuskegee syphilis study originally started, and how did it change over time? 5. A common defense of the Nazi doctors at the Trial of Nuremberg was that the atrocities they committed were not illegal. Was that true? What ethical theory/principle do their actions violate regardless of the legality/illegality of their actions. 6. What historical event sparked the creation of the Nuremberg code and briefly summarize the main protections laid out in that document. 7. Briefly describe the situation that precipitated the creation of the "Prussian Directive of 1900" and the protections it afforded patients. 8. Describe 'individualistic autonomy' versus 'principled autonomy' as discussed in Stirrat and Gill's article "Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill" (Issue 1.1; Taking Sides). 9. What are some reasons Brock and Wartman (Issue 1.1 Taking Sides) believe that competent people can make irrational medical decisions? 10. Contrast medical paternalism and shared decision making as described by Brock and Wartman (Issue 1.1; Taking Sides).