I need each of these discussion questions answered briefly. Provide two scholarly references for each post. Provide examples as needed. I will number each discussion, so please have each discussion in a separate document. There are a total of 8 separate discussions.

Discussion #1- In your own words, describe the difference between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Select an argument for or against either euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. How would you defend your argument? Discussion #2- This week, we are learning about issues surrounding human genetics and eugenics, including stem cell research, cloning, and genetic testing and treatment. Choose and describe a scientific technique or practice related to genetics and eugenics. Provide the rationale behind the use of this technique or practice. Discuss your thoughts and ideas regarding the technique or practice. Is it ever justifiable? Why or why not? Discussion #3- Animal research is a necessary practice in the world of medical research, allowing scientists to develop life-saving interventions and to spot catastrophic problems before new techniques or products make their way to actual patients. However, this does not mean that we should deny that there are serious ethical issues involved. Animal testing is not a pretty or pleasant process. It causes pain and suffering to animal subjects, and legitimate cases of abuse have been uncovered by animal rights groups. Consequently, the practice should be tightly regulated, and alternative methods should be employed whenever possible. Discussion Prompt: Discuss a specific research study involving animals that had ethical issues. What were the ethical issues involved? What could have been done to conduct the research study differently to avoid these ethical issues? Discussion #4- Is abortion morally wrong? Should abortion be illegal? Discussion Prompt: Choose one of the questions above and argue both sides with supporting evidence. Please write your discussion choice in the title line. Discussion #5- Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ? How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them? Discussion #6- How do you define privacy? Do you believe privacy is a moral right? Why or why not? Are there any cases in which public health policy justifies the violation of the right to privacy? Discussion #7- Some consider fair access to health care a moral right, while others disagree. We have defined the term moral right as "a privilege to act in some specific, intentional manner or to obtain some specific benefit because one is a moral agent living in a community of moral agents under a shared moral standard." Discussion Prompt: Is access to health care a moral right? Why or why not? Discussion #8- "Stem cells are undifferentiated, primitive cells with the ability both to multiply and to differentiate into specific kinds of cells. Stem cells hold the promise of allowing researchers to grow specialized cells or tissue, which could be used to treat injuries or disease (e.g., spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, strokes, burns)." (Slevin, 2010) Choose ONE of the following issues to write your initial discussion posting about and post to the thread with supporting evidence. Title your initial post with the title of the issue. Discuss what you feel are the potential benefits of stem cell research for Alzheimer's patients and their families. Share your perspective on the stem cell debate regarding donation of surplus embryos to couples for “embryo adoption.” Why is the task of disposing unused frozen human embryos different from disposing of other medical tissue? Discuss why you think embryonic stem cell research “crosses a moral boundary.”