A title page The body of the paper: 4–6 pages of text, double-spaced, 12-point font with clear and understandable language with no grammar or spelling errors Provide adequate justification that supports your response with at least three appropriate references using textbooks, websites, and articles are required Subheadings (historical and contemporary aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion) Appropriate in-text citations throughout paper (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/). A reference page with only the sources that you used in the body of the paper (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/06/). Sources should be less than 5 years old unless there has not been recent research available. At least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a profession journal. Do not use Wikipedia or encyclopedia as they are not co

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Content Name: Signature Assignment Final Paper Exit Grid View List View Meets Expectations Approaches Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Content Points Range: 48 (40%) - 60 (50%) Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas. Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Points Range: 36 (30%) - 47.4 (39.5%) Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion. Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Points Range: 0 (0%) - 35.4 (29.5%) The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course. The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment. Organization/ Cohesiveness Points Range: 19.2 (16%) - 24 (20%) Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful. Points Range: 14.4 (12%) - 18.96 (15.8%) Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing. Points Range: 0 (0%) - 14.16 (11.8%) Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented. Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present. Supporting Evidence/Research Points Range: 19.2 (16%) - 24 (20%) Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic. Points Range: 14.4 (12%) - 18.96 (15.8%) Fewer than three appropriate sources are used. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics. Points Range: 0 (0%) - 14.16 (11.8%) Sources are missing. Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases. Mechanics and APA Formatting Points Range: 9.6 (8%) - 12 (10%) The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. Points Range: 7.2 (6%) - 9.48 (7.9%) The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. Points Range: 0 (0%) - 7.08 (5.9%) No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Name:Signature Assignment Final Paper Exit