For this assessment you will read the attached case study, which presents the existing technology and needs of a fictional organization. You will propose an emerging technology solution that will benefit the organization in the case study. You will need to discuss the impacts of this technology within the context of the organization. For some reason I can't attach the case study. I will provide it once the assignment is awarded.

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. A. Summarize an organizational need in the case study, including the scope of the need. B. Propose an emerging technology solution to address the organizational need from the case study. Provide justification that classifies this technology as emerging. C. Outline an adoption process for the technology solution you plan to implement, using the risks and benefits of early adoption versus the risks and benefits of later adoption to justify your adoption timing. D. Describe potential positive and negative effects your technology solution could have on the people and current processes in the organization, providing examples for how to address any negative effects. E. Compare your technology solution to similar existing technology solutions, including details that qualify how your chosen technology better supports the organization’s mission, goals, and vision. F. Propose methods for measuring the impact of the technology, including specific metrics that would support whether the adoption is successful or unsuccessful. G. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. H. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. RUBRIC A:ORGANIZATIONAL NEED NOT EVIDENT A summary of an organizational need is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission summarizes an organizational need in the case study but does not include the scope of the need. COMPETENT The submission summarizes an organizational need in the case study and includes the scope of the need. B:EMERGING TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION NOT EVIDENT A proposed technology is not provided or the proposed technology cannot be classified as an emerging technology. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission proposes an emerging technology, but the technology does not address the identified organizational need from the case study, or the submission does not provide justification that classifies the proposed technology as emerging. COMPETENT The submission proposes an emerging technology solution that addresses the identified organizational need from the case study and provides justification that classifies the proposed technology as emerging. C:ADOPTION PROCESS NOT EVIDENT An outline of an adoption process for the technology solution is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission outlines an adoption process for the technology solution but does not justify the adoption timing with risks and benefits of early and later adoption of the technology. COMPETENT The submission outlines an adoption process for the technology solution, justifying the adoption timing with risks and benefits of early and later adoption of the technology. D:TECHNOLOGY IMPACT NOT EVIDENT An explanation of the effects of the technology solution is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission describes the potential positive and negative effects the technology solution could have on the people and current processes in the organization but does not provide examples for how to address any negative effects. COMPETENT The submission describes the potential positive and negative effects the technology solution could have on the people and current processes in the organization and provides examples for how to address any negative effects. E:TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON NOT EVIDENT A comparison of the proposed technology solution to similar existing technology solutions is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission compares the proposed technology solution to similar existing technology solutions but does not include details that qualify how the chosen technology better supports the organization’s mission, goals, and vision. COMPETENT The submission compares the proposed technology solution to similar existing technology solutions, including details that qualify how the chosen technology better supports the organization’s mission, goals, and vision. F:ADOPTION METRICS NOT EVIDENT A proposal for measuring the impact of the technology is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission proposes methods for measuring the impact of the technology, but the methods or metrics proposed are not specific or would not support whether the adoption of the proposed technology is successful or unsuccessful. COMPETENT The submission proposes methods for measuring the impact of the technology, including specific methods and metrics that would support whether the adoption of the proposed technology is successful or unsuccessful. G: SOURCES NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. I: PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. Must be competent in each category of the rubric. The paper must have 3 pages of body.