Instruction
The U.S. diplomatic efforts to promote anti-crime and counterterrorism goals occur through bilateral, regional, and multilateral mechanisms. But, is this strategy the right approach? Is it working? More so;
1. What are some of the weaknesses in prosecuting our national strategies against transnational crime? Are we having any success with our national strategies? If so, what are they? If not, what do you believe to be the obstacles and issues?
2. Do you think some of the provisions of the RICO Act Title 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. might be implemented to reduce or eliminate the transnational crime funding of terrorist organizations? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96
3. What are your recommendations and possible solutions to provide more strength (bite) to our national strategy in reducing and or eliminating transnational crimes funding to terrorist organizations.
In 600 words and APA format (intext and work cited page needed), respond to the above.