Instruction
This introduction section (1 paragraph) should include a summary of the narrowed, local topic and why it is controversial. Write to a general audience. It should include your position on the topic BEFORE you did your research and analysis. Include your thesis statement (this is your topic plus your controlling idea—or how your opinion has been impacted by the research).
Opposing Arguments: This section (5 paragraphs) should introduce, summarize, and paraphrase the oppositions’ main claims and the evidence that supports those claims. This should be written in an objective tone and with an eye to accuracy. Represent the opposition fairly. Use critical thinking and set aside your own biases. Do NOT critique their arguments at this point. Just summarize: who are the persons, institutions, agencies, etc. who support this position? What are their main arguments and how do they support these? Each paragraph needs to be fully and properly cited. Do NOT rely too much on direct quotations.
Analysis: This section (3-5 paragraphs) is your chance to evaluate each of the opposing arguments presented in your references. Review logical fallacies and the material on critical thinking in your text, and then discuss where the opposition may have it right and where they may have it wrong. Use your critical thinking skills to evaluate and synthesize your references. What, if any, are the presuppositions of this position? Assumptions? Propaganda? Distortions of "truth"? Logical fallacies?? (See A Writer's Resource for a good listing.) What "vested interest" might these persons, institutions, agencies have in supporting their agenda? What is your reaction to the facts, data, premises, and assumptions--in short, the position of this opposing side? (This is an opportunity to briefly offer your own position—with support, of course.)
Conclusion: In this section (1-2 paragraphs), please describe any changes that have occurred in your position, however minor and in either direction. Perhaps you are MORE convinced than ever of the validity of your views. Maybe, your eyes have been opened or your mind changed. How has evaluating the oppositions’ views impacted your own? You will not be evaluated based upon your opinions, but how well you demonstrate critical thinking and how well you support your view and apply your understanding of logical fallacies.
Resources:
Cavitt, M. (2017, September 01). New law has Oakland County police agencies researching body cameras. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://www.theoaklandpress.com/news/nation-world-news/new-law-has-oakland-county-police-agencies-researching-body-cameras/article_0cb13e37-f561-5712-9cbb-df7e85380cae.html
Gerstein, M. (2017, July 12). Snyder signs law limiting police bodycam video release. Retrieved October 30, 2018, from https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2017/07/12/snyder-body-cameras-limited-release/103643932/
Hunter, G. (2018, August 22). Body cameras show Detroit police on both sides of law. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2018/08/21/body-cameras-show-detroit-police-both-sides-law/957615002/
Michigan Radio Newsroom. (2014, December 9). The downsides of police body cameras. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from http://www.michiganradio.org/post/downsides-police-body-cameras
News New Legislation. (n.d.). Retrieved October 31, 2018, from http://www.polc.org/police-body-camera-law-signed-by-michigan-governor/
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(pzekzrpv2mlskiyh2doixbbr))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2017-HB-4427