Instruction
Write an essay in which you contrast Buchanan and Forst’s justification for human rights. Your essay should have an introduction with a thesis (a position or assertion that you intend to support with evidence), a discussion section with supporting evidence and a conclusion. Be sure to address the following issues in the discussion section of your response:
Whose argument do you find more convincing? Why?
How do their replies to the parochialism objection differ? Whose argument do you find more convincing? Why?
How would a parochialist respond to Buchanan or Forst’s replies to the parochialism objection?
What weaknesses would they find in their reply?
Is there a real world example that bolsters the claims made by parochialists?
Your essay should, if applicable:
Incorporate the key points of the article you submitted in the “Research” activity.
Explain how the article sheds light (or not) on human rights.
Cite learning from a concept map: either the one you developed with your team or from your Reflect activity.
Length: 500 words
Format: Word document, double-spaced, Arial 12 point font, 1” margins