Social work

Responsiveness to Directions-- Excellent 51.3 (27%) - 57 (30%) Paper fully addresses all instruction prompts. Good 45.6 (24%) - 50.73 (26.7%) Paper addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed. Fair 39.9 (21%) - 45.03 (23.7%) Paper addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts. Poor 0 (0%) - 39.33 (20.7%) Paper does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts. Content-- Excellent 51.3 (27%) - 57 (30%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought. Good 45.6 (24%) - 50.73 (26.7%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought. Fair 39.9 (21%) - 45.03 (23.7%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought. Poor 0 (0%) - 39.33 (20.7%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought. Competency Engage in Policy Practice - Knowledge-- Excellent 8.55 (4.5%) - 9.5 (5%) Student demonstrates excellent knowledge related to policy and policy implications. Student is able to identify a specific policy, goals of the policy, and funding for policy. Good 7.6 (4%) - 8.46 (4.45%) Student demonstrates good knowledge related to policy and policy implications. Student is able to identify a specific policy, goals of the policy, and funding for policy. Fair 6.65 (3.5%) - 7.5 (3.95%) Student demonstrates some knowledge related to policy and policy implications. Student identifies policy, but may not identify a specific policy or insufficiently identify goals and funding policy. Poor 0 (0%) - 6.55 (3.45%) Student demonstrates little or no knowledge related to policy and policy implications. Student is not able to identify a specific policy and/or inaccurate identifies goals and funding. Competency Engage in Policy Practice - Cognitive and Affective Processes-- Excellent 8.55 (4.5%) - 9.5 (5%) Student demonstrates exemplary critical thought when analyzing policy implications. Student demonstrates excellent analysis of policy impact and recommendations for alternative policy. Good 7.6 (4%) - 8.46 (4.45%) Student demonstrates good critical thought when analyzing policy implications. Student demonstrates good analysis of policy impact and recommendations for alternative policy. Fair 6.65 (3.5%) - 7.5 (3.95%) Student demonstrates some critical thought when explaining how the policy will impact a client, but ideas may need further development. Student demonstrates fair analysis of policy impact and recommendations for alternative policy. Poor 0 (0%) - 6.55 (3.45%) Student demonstrates little or no critical thought when analyzing policy implications. Student demonstrates poor analysis of policy impact and recommendations for alternative policy. Writing-- Excellent 51.3 (27%) - 57 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. Good 45.6 (24%) - 50.73 (26.7%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. Fair 39.9 (21%) - 45.03 (23.7%) Paper is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality). Poor 0 (0%) - 39.33 (20.7%) Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.