Loading
Rating:
Date: 17/02/2017
Feedback Given By: User_8220
Feedback Comment:
Project Details
Project Status: Completed
This work has been completed by: Academicresearchpro
Total payment made for this project was: $25.00
Project Summary: (Critical analysis of an article Essay) read the article and analysis it for me. The guidelines for the essay mus be: I need my entry paragraph to be a summery of the thesis statement or or the main points in article you going to read. And you shouldn't use agree or disagree you should be writing as the third person it got nothing to do with your opinion. 2. In the bodies paragraph I need you to "evaluate"and analyses the author strategies of writing, for example, is the author organizing his ideas on the right order also whether if the author biased or not as well as the author reasons and the evidence, facts he or she using are thy effective. you can quotes on the body paragraphs but not in the entry. 3.In the conclusion you should remind again whether the evaluation was positive or negative and effective or not . 4. It should be2 to 3 pages essay include the work cities page. the work should be done in 10 hours and no plagiarism Rhetorical analysis of an argument becomes the basis of your own argument about the effectiveness of the argument when you write a critical analysis. As you read an argument and prepare to analyze it, write down answers to the following questions: 1. Who is the audience? Look at contextdate, publicationas well as argument to figure out time, place, and its values. 2. Who is the author? Look at publication, date, credentials, argument. What ethos does the author create? 3. What kind of argument is this? What is its purpose (inform, explore, convince, meditate, make decision), occasion (past/forensic, present/epideictic or ceremonial, future/deliberative), and status (fact, definition, evaluation, proposal)? 4. What is the main claim? What are the supporting claims? What kind of evidence does the writer rely onfacts, authorities, reasoning? What assumptions seem to connect the claim and the support? 5. What kinds of appeals does the writer rely onlogical, emotional, moral/ethical? 6. What is the writers stylehumorous, informal, academic?