Flight Deck Interface (safety) 300 word

Explain the issues and concerns (pros and cons) of Flight Deck Human-Machine Interface and the concept of "fail-safe." Consider the history and provide both the positives and possible hazards to this interface. Remember, you must have a title page, 300-word body written in the third person, and at least two references. Review the Assignments information page for details regarding the assignment, formatting criteria, and so forth. Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number. Do not add punctuation or special characters. Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any material! The intent of the course assignments is for you to apply the material covered in the readings by researching how these concepts have been applied in the real world. You will be further challenged to provide critical analysis demonstrating an understanding of the concepts. It is always helpful to share experiences from the field, but make sure to stick to the facts and provide cited references to support the anecdotal observations. Each assignment will use the following APA format: 1-2 pages (approximately 300-words) - Quality is more important than quantity. 1" margins Double-spaced 12 pt. Times New Roman font Include name on the front page. Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number. Do not add punctuation or special characters. Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any material! SFTY 409 6.3 COA UG Writing Assignments Rubric V2 Criteria Ratings Pts Organization and Context Should provide an effective and concise overview/introduction; develops a coherent, central theme that is expressed in a structured, organized, and logical manner. 20.0 pts Exceeds Standards 16.0 pts Meets Standards 14.0 pts Does Not Meet Standards 20.0 pts Knowledge and Comprehension Should address given assignment requirements; there should be evidence from course content and from valid, external sources should be used. 30.0 pts Exceeds Standards 24.0 pts Meets Standards 21.0 pts Does Not Meet Standards 30.0 pts Analysis, Evaluation, and Application Should identify and analyze issues and relationships between factors with examples; supports argument based upon solid body of evidence; should apply to real-life situations and defined, if required. 30.0 pts Exceeds Standards 24.0 pts Meets Standards 21.0 pts Does Not Meet Standards 30.0 pts Style and Mechanics Mechanics of style should enhance content understanding, and writing skillfully supports the message and is in required format. Citations and references present and IAW APA. 20.0 pts Exceeds Standards 16.0 pts Meets Standards 14.0 pts Does Not Meet Standards 20.0 pts Ignite_SLO_1 Define and/or articulate a research problem threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Ignite_SLO-2 Design a course of action to solve a research problem using, as appropriate, multi-disciplinary principles threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Ignite_SLO-3 Apply ethical principles in research threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Ignite_SLO-4 Conduct research independently and/or collaboratively threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Ignite_SLO-5 Reach decisions or conclusions based on the analysis and synthesis of evidence threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Ignite_SLO-6 Communicate research results threshold: 1.0 pts 1.0 pts Meets Expectations 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations -- Total Points: 100.0