I NEED A ROUGH DRAFT FOR MY ENGLISH 104 CLASS BY TONIGHT. THIS IS THE PROMPT (I included my outline, you can edit it to make it better): Consider Coogan’s definition of a superhero. Apply this definition to a well-known character (either from a book or film) or historical figure who is NOT commonly thought of as a superhero. Create an argument in which you demonstrate how/why your person or character is a superhero even if he/she does not meet the definition precisely. (Remember, Coogan calls the Hulk a superhero even though he lacks a mission, and Batman a superhero even though he lacks super powers). In order to answer this question, you will need to find flaws in Coogan’s definition and/or amend it with your own definition. You can also use other readings in this unit (which offer more flexible definitions) to support your claims. THANK YOU