In our Stringer (2007 textbook, in Chapter 9, you will find the deepest probe into the meaning and generation of scientific knowledge and where action research stands as a research endeavor. The complex controversies surrounding the role and place of science in contemporary life are arrayed so the reader can consider the core ideas of influential theorists. From time to time in your readings, you have encountered brief commentaries about Kurt Lewin, considered the Father of Action Research. The Burnes (2004) article gives a more in-depth portrayal of how Lewins perspective evolved and compares Lewins ideas with a number of contemporary strategies aimed at organizational change. Lewin did most of his work in the 1940s and 1950s; Burnes makes a strong case for the continuing practical relevance of Lewins ideas. Required Reference Material: Be sure to apply and cite sources within your initial post response and also reference the sources at the end of your response (using APA formatting). Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re- appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002. In Chapter 9 of our Stringer (2007) textbook, two general perspectives are presented, the modern and the post-modern. In your response: 1.Apply and cite supportive research to explain which of these perspectives you would you want to have inform and guide organizational actions. 2.Additionally apply and cite relevant information from the Burnes article to explain if and why you will keep using Lewins methods.