Learning OutcomeParagraph 5 Excellent (above standards) After watching each of the different shows, how do you feel they compare to the episodes of Sesame Street was very detailed. What are the similarities, and the differences addressed thoroughly. Which did you enjoy more or less was detailed. Whether you think that in regards teaching children and impacting their development the other shows did a better job than Sesame Street, or do you think Sesame Street is better discussed thoroughly. Good (meets standards) After watching each of the different shows, how do you feel they compare to the episodes of Sesame Street was mostly detailed. What are the similarities, and the differences somewhat addressed. Which did you enjoy more or less was somewhat conveyed. Whether you think that in regards teaching children and impacting their development the other shows did a better job than Sesame Street, or do you think Sesame Street is better somewhat discussed. Unacceptable (below standards) After watching each of the different shows, how do you feel they compare to the episodes of Sesame Street was not sufficiently detailed. What are the similarities, and the differences not addressed with enough detail. Which did you enjoy more or less was unclear. Whether you think that in regards teaching children and impacting their development the other shows did a better job than Sesame Street, or do you think Sesame Street is better was discussed with little detail. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClosing Paragraph Excellent (above standards) Please summarize briefly. Did watching these episodes of all the shows make you rethink educational programming for your children? What are your thoughts? Good (meets standards) A summary was mostly provided. Answered somewhat whether watching these episodes of all the shows make you rethink educational programming for your children. Unacceptable (below standards) A summary was not provided in enough detail. Did not answer whether watching these episodes of all the shows make you rethink educational programming for your children. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Requirements Excellent (above standards) APA formatted cover page. Paragraphs double spaced with 1 inch margins. Page numbers placed upper right corned. Free from grammar/spelling errors. Good (meets standards) APA format followed with some errors. Paragraphs not double spaced with 1 inch margins. Page numbers placed in wrong location. Few spelling/Grammar errors. Unacceptable (below standards) APA format followed and/or present. Paragraphs not double spaced with 1 inch margins. No page numbers.. Multiple spelling/Grammar errors which distracted from the paper content. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 4 Show 3 description Excellent (above standards) After watching the episodes of , the specific themes or concepts being depicted in each segment was discussed in much detail. A thorough explanation of how the episode would develop a child’s cognitive and language skills was provided. Whether you feel that the material presented was sensitive to a child’s ethnicity, culture, or sociocultural environment was addressed thoroughly. Good (meets standards) After watching the episodes of , the details of the specific themes or concepts being depicted in each segment was mostly conveyed. An explanation of how the episode would develop a child’s cognitive and language skills was mostly conveyed. Whether the material presented was sensitive to a child’s ethnicity, culture, or sociocultural environment was mostly conveyed. Unacceptable (below standards) After watching the episodes of , the details of the specific themes or concepts being depicted in each segment was not adequately conveyed. An explanation of how the episode would develop a child’s cognitive and language skills was not adequately conveyed. Whether the material presented was sensitive to a child’s ethnicity, culture, or sociocultural environment was not adequately conveyed.