QUESTION: Do you think that a non-positivistic approach to research for development would offer more 'valid' or 'credible' and 'reliable' or 'dependable' outputs/results than research based on a positivistic research design? If so, why? If not, why not? What is 'Development' about? Who decides? Does it have an end? Case Study Reflections Given the readings below, provide a definition of crises and then offer a brief opinion on some the characteristics of contemporary crises (for example, local level versus regional or global-systemic, or on the depth of crises whether structural, cyclical or epochal?) There are readings provided. each post should be no less than 250 words and no more than 500. Please No AI!!!!!!!!!! I need an AI REPORT when finised. I'll attach documents below