2 pages, Summey 2 articles I attached and Reader’s Responses and my reaction

Larsen, M. A. & Beech, J. (2014). Spatial theorizing in comparative and international education research. (1 peage ) Reader’s Responses: You will be expected to complete a reader’s response for the readings for this course. This is expected to be: 1) a summary of what you read, identifying the main argument, terms and theories introduced by the author, and 2) a space where you can think about the readings and document your reaction(s) to them. Since these are discussions/reflections, you do not need to adhere to all of the formalities of a paper. That said, the discussion posts should be well thought-out, fully developed and carefully written. Each reader response should demonstrate not only that you have carefully read the text(s), but also that you have thought deeply about the text(s) and engaged with them in some way. Be specific about the work you’re discussing, provide details from the text to back up any assertions you may make by quoting directly from the text, and finally, pay attention to grammar and mechanics. Some guidelines for online sharing and responding. When you respond, be sure to paraphrase what you are referring to in your response, APA Style. Follow the QUSTION: • Why are we reading these articles? How do they connect with the themes of the course? • Which parts of the articles are most useful to me? • What is the main argument of each article? • What evidence do the authors use to support and develop their argument? Ozga, J. & Lingard, B. (2007). Globalisation, education policy and politics. (1 peage) Reader’s Responses: You will be expected to complete a reader’s response for the readings for this course. This is expected to be: 1) a summary of what you read, identifying the main argument, terms and theories introduced by the author, and 2) a space where you can think about the readings and document your reaction(s) to them. Since these are discussions/reflections, you do not need to adhere to all of the formalities of a paper. That said, the discussion posts should be well thought-out, fully developed and carefully written. Each reader response should demonstrate not only that you have carefully read the text(s), but also that you have thought deeply about the text(s) and engaged with them in some way. Be specific about the work you’re discussing, provide details from the text to back up any assertions you may make by quoting directly from the text, and finally, pay attention to grammar and mechanics. Some guidelines for online sharing and responding. When you respond, be sure to paraphrase what you are referring to in your response, APA Style. QUESTION: • Why are we reading these articles? How do they connect with the themes of the course? • Which parts of the articles are most useful to me? • What is the main argument of each article? • What evidence do the authors use to support and develop their argument? * My Reaction and add quotation (2 paragraphs )