Instruction
Sally Falk Moore discusses the following three (earlier) anthropological approaches to law: Law as a form of culture, a form of domination, and law as a problem solver. First, please explain each of theses approaches in 2-3 sentences. Second, try criticizing each argument with 1-2 sentences. What do these perspectives leave out? What are their shortcomings? And last but not least, what ‘school’ would you associate Malinowski's conceptualization of law among indigenous in Melanesia as according to the aforementioned categories with, and why? Take the following quote as a lead:
"The main province of law is in the social mechanism, which is to be found at the bottom of all the real obligations and covers a very vast portion of their custom, though by no means all of it, as we know (p. 18)."