Instruction
this is the question: McCrudden discusses four different meanings of equality and makes the argument that we need to include all of these in our understanding of the concept of equality for policy-making purposes. In other words, "equality" must not be a one-size-fits-all concept, but rather a flexible one that allows for different interpretations in different situations. Do you agree with this? Why or why not? Alternatively, do you find one of the meanings/types he offers more compelling than the others? If so, why?