Submission Type: Table Create a body of evidence (Evaluation Table) to compare the three studies you appraised in weeks 4 and 5. See the evaluation table templates D1 and D2 (linked below) for examples. In weeks 4 and 5, you completed the critical appraisal of three studies. This week, you will meld these studies into a synthesis upon which to base practice and standards of care. To create this synthesis, you’ll compare the three studies using an “Evaluation Table” that includes the following: Citation: Author, Date of Publication, & Title Purpose of Study Conceptual Framework Design/ Method Sample/Setting Major Variables Studied and Their Definitions Measurement of Major Variables Data Analysis Study Findings Worth to Practice: Level of Evidence Strengths/Weaknesses Feasibility Conclusion Your PICOT question is the driver for the evaluation table and synthesis tables. For example, with data analysis, while many statistics may be reported in a study, only those statistics that assist you in answering your clinical question should be placed in the table. Also, only the findings relevant to the clinical question should be placed in the table. Keeping the order of information placed in the table clear and simple is imperative for comparisons across studies for synthesis. Some suggestions to make the table user-friendly are to: (a) use abbreviations (e.g., RCT) with a legend for interpretation, (b) keep the order of the information the same in each study, and (c) place similar statistics in the same order in each study for easy comparison. Citation.docxDownload Citation.docx Appendix_D1_Evaluation_Table_Template.pdf Appendix D2 Evidence Synthesis TablesTemplate.pdf rubric Complete and accurate citations for all three studies. Citations are in the correct format with no errors. Clearly and accurately describes the purpose of each study, directly relating it to the PICOT question. Frameworks are clearly defined for all studies and well related to their respective purposes and designs. All study designs and methods are accurately described and appropriate for the PICOT question. Sample and setting are thoroughly described for each study, showing clear relevance to the research question. Variables and their definitions are clearly listed and relevant to the PICOT question for all studies. Measurements are accurately described and clearly relevant to the PICOT question in all studies. Analysis methods are correctly described and clearly justified in their ability to address the PICOT question. Findings are thoroughly and accurately reported, directly addressing the PICOT question. (1) Correct identification and justification of evidence level. (2) Insightful analysis of strengths and weaknesses. (3) Realistic feasibility assessment. (4) Insightful conclusions directly derived from data.