Read the scope before the rule
This starter covers ten US institutions, not every university. A teaching-center example is not a course permission. Your school, program and assignment rules may differ; ask your instructor before using a tool when the rule is unclear.
“Not stated” means the reviewed page does not answer that question. It does not mean permission. Follow the official link for changes since our review. Schools do not endorse this directory.
University of Arizona
University of Arizona student guidance; linked colleges and Global Campus have separate guidance.
Source type: Student guidance
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
University of Arizona Responsible AI
You can only use AI for assignments if your instructor says it’s OK.
- Course permission
- Get instructor permission. The guidance describes red, yellow and green course rules; these are not one permission level for every class.
- Detector guidance
- Not stated in the reviewed source.
- Disclosure
- Cite permitted AI-generated content; the page links a library citation guide.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
Florida State University
FSU central AI student and academic-integrity guidance.
Source type: Student and faculty guidance
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
Florida State University AI: students · Florida State University AI: academic integrity
Be sure to read the course syllabus carefully for guidance on the use of AI technologies
- Course permission
- Read the course syllabus and ask the professor before using AI when the rules are unclear.
- Detector guidance
- The linked academic-integrity page advises against AI detection tools and says they are not university-licensed.
- Disclosure
- Check the course instructions; the student page does not give a universal disclosure format.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
CITL teaching guidance for instructors; not a blanket student permission.
Source type: Teaching-center guidance
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
Illinois Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning
Your syllabus policies should address the importance of academic integrity and the use of AI.
- Course permission
- The guidance asks instructors to explain course AI rules and their learning goals.
- Detector guidance
- CITL warns that detector results can be biased and inaccurate and may not be persuasive in an integrity case.
- Disclosure
- The page says AI-generated text and ideas need citation. Course permission is a separate question.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
Indiana University
Teaching.IU guidance; example statements from an IU Bloomington FACET team.
Source type: Guidance and sample syllabus statements
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
sample syllabus statements that you may consider as starting templates
- Course permission
- The permissive and restrictive examples are templates, not rules for every IU course. Check your instructor, department and campus.
- Detector guidance
- Not stated in the reviewed source.
- Disclosure
- Disclosure requirements shown here belong to sample policies. Follow the policy actually adopted for your course.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
University of Kentucky
CELT course-policy examples for instructors.
Source type: Guidance and sample syllabus statements
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
It is up to the instructor to decide whether student use of generative AI (GenAI) is appropriate for their courses
- Course permission
- Instructors decide the permitted uses, including assignment-specific rules. No-use and conditional-use examples are not university-wide permissions.
- Detector guidance
- CELT cautions about detector effectiveness and links its ADVANCE guidance.
- Disclosure
- Check the course policy adopted by your instructor; this page presents alternatives.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
Purdue University
Purdue teaching guidance; do not apply this entry to Purdue Global.
Source type: Vice-provost teaching guidance
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
Purdue Office of the Vice Provost for Teaching and Learning
Authorization is determined at the course level by the instructor.
- Course permission
- The instructor sets authorized uses for assessed work and learning activities and should explain them in the syllabus.
- Detector guidance
- Guidance calls for careful review; a detector result should not be the sole factor in an integrity finding.
- Disclosure
- Check your syllabus; this page does not set a universal student disclosure format.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
Rutgers University
University OIT guidance; program and instructor rules still apply.
Source type: University IT guidance
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
Rutgers Office of Information Technology
they should not be considered permissible for coursework unless clearly stated or communicated by instructors.
- Course permission
- Do not assume tool availability permits coursework use. Follow the program and instructor rules.
- Detector guidance
- Not stated in the reviewed source.
- Disclosure
- No universal disclosure format stated on this page; ask your instructor.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
San Jose State University
SJSU Student Affairs FAQ; classes can set different standards.
Source type: Student Affairs FAQ
Source date: Page last updated April 18, 2025
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
San Jose State University Student Affairs
Always check with your professor or teaching assistant first.
- Course permission
- Check with the instructor or teaching assistant. The FAQ distinguishes permitted use from different class standards.
- Detector guidance
- Not stated in the reviewed source.
- Disclosure
- Document permitted use; the FAQ links the Student AI Disclosure (SAID) tool.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
Stanford University
Board on Conduct Affairs guidance on coursework and the Honor Code.
Source type: Honor Code policy guidance
Source date: Guidance adopted February 16, 2023
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
Stanford Board on Conduct Affairs · Stanford: Student Accountability Process (2023 Charter)
Students who are unsure of policies regarding generative AI tools are encouraged to ask their instructors for clarification.
- Course permission
- Instructors set course rules. Without a clear rule, treat AI assistance like help from another person; using it to substantially complete work is not permitted.
- Detector guidance
- OCS recommends advance notice if instructors may use detection software.
- Disclosure
- Acknowledge non-incidental use; disclose assistance when in doubt.
- Misconduct and appeals
- The linked 2023 Charter process describes evidence review with a Conduct Investigator and possible hearings. Read it for the applicable procedure and deadlines.
Yale University
Poorvu Center guidance; Yale College and graduate/professional schools set their own standards.
Source type: Teaching-center guidance and course examples
Source date: Not stated
Checked: 2026-10-03 (UTC)
The Poorvu Center does not set or enforce policy
- Course permission
- Most school policies leave decisions to course instructors. The examples on this page are not a university-wide permission.
- Detector guidance
- Not stated in the reviewed source.
- Disclosure
- Some course examples specify citations and records of AI use. Check the requirements for your own class.
- Misconduct and appeals
- Not verified in this starter; check your school's current procedure.
No matching school in this starter. Ask your institution for its current rules.